On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 16:43, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote: > 2012/5/1 Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com>: >> Will this package go through the provisional state mandated by PEP 411 ? > > I don't see PEP 411 requiring any module to go through its process. >
You're right, it doesn't require it. However, since Nick's summary above mentioned a "draft API", I thought this package can be a good candidate for a PEP-411-process. Without PEP 411, once a module gets into stdlib, its API is pretty much locked. If we are wary of such lock-in with the current state ipaddr's API is in, PEP 411 seems like a reasonable way to go. Eli _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
