On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4 bots > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py - > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with' > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap > Python-ast.h/c > > Two questions: > > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I touch > asdl* ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that > changed. > If Python-ast.* are checked in then yes. > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because Python-ast.* > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the bots or > users? > I don't see why not. the touch extension for hg is there specifically for these files to prevent having to regenerate them.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
