On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4 bots >> (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py - >> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with' >> statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap >> Python-ast.h/c >> >> Two questions: >> >> * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I touch >> asdl* ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that >> changed. >> > > If Python-ast.* are checked in then yes. > Hmm, how do I do that? hg doesn't accept them for commit since their contents are not changed. > > >> * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because Python-ast.* >> are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the bots or >> users? >> > > I don't see why not. the touch extension for hg is there specifically for > these files to prevent having to regenerate them. >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
