> >> 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com>: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4 > bots > >> > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py - > >> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with' > >> > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap > >> > Python-ast.h/c > >> > > >> > Two questions: > >> > > >> > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I touch > >> > asdl* > >> > ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that > >> > changed. > >> > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because > >> > Python-ast.* > >> > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the bots > or > >> > users? > >> > >> We should have the buildbots run "make touch", so they don't need to > >> run asdl_c.py. > > > > > > How should we go about doing this? > > Complain to Antoine I suppose. :) > [+ Antoine] Done :)
While we're at it, it seems that .hgtouch is wrong: Include/ast.h: Parser/Python.asdl Parser/asdl.py Parser/asdl_c.py Python/Python-ast.c: Include/ast.h The file Include/ast.h is not, in fact, auto-generated. But Include/Python-ast.h *is*, and it does not appear in this file. Typo? [+Ezio] Eli
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
