On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:46:07 -0700 > Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com>: > > > >> > Hi All, > > > >> > > > > >> > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the > 3.4 > > > bots > > > >> > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py - > > > >> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the > 'with' > > > >> > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap > > > >> > Python-ast.h/c > > > >> > > > > >> > Two questions: > > > >> > > > > >> > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I > touch > > > >> > asdl* > > > >> > ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that > > > >> > changed. > > > >> > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because > > > >> > Python-ast.* > > > >> > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the > bots > > > or > > > >> > users? > > > >> > > > >> We should have the buildbots run "make touch", so they don't need to > > > >> run asdl_c.py. > > > > > > > > > > > > How should we go about doing this? > > > > > > Complain to Antoine I suppose. :) > > > > > [+ Antoine] > > Done :) > > "make touch"? Wow, I'm learning new stuff everyday :-) > > (what point is there in adding things to Makefile if nobody knows about > them?) > The devguide would be a good place to mention this. http://bugs.python.org/issue15964 tracked the task for a while, but I'm not sure what the status is. Eli
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
