Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> writes: > Are you volunteering to write a competing PEP for a migration to git > and GitHub?
Anyone who does decide to propose either Git or GitHub for hosting Python resources: Please don't conflate the two. Git is a community-supported free-software DVCS system with many viable hosting platforms and providers. GitHub is one proprietary hosting service with features that encourage vendor lock-in, and as Barry Warsaw pointed out it is not answerable to the PSF nor under the PSF's control. There are other hosting solutions without these problems. Everyone here already knows this distinction at some level, but it's far too common to see people assume that an argument in favour of Git will also be a compelling case for GitHub. It isn't, and the case for the latter needs to be made quite separately from the case for the former. No, I'm not offering to write such a PEP either. I'm requesting that we recognise that a promotion of GitHub needs to account for its downsides too, and needs to promote its specific benefits separately from the benefits of Git. -- \ “There are no significant bugs in our released software that | `\ any significant number of users want fixed.” —Bill Gates, | _o__) 1995-10-23 | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
