On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I can bravely claim that it is better than *any*
> hex notation, it just follows from what I have here
> on paper on my table, namely that it is physically
> impossible to make up highly effective glyph system
> of more than 8 symbols.
You should go and hang out with jmf. Both of you have made bold
assertions that our current system is physically/mathematically
impossible, despite the fact that *it is working*. Neither of you can
cite any actual scientific research to back your claims.
Python-ideas mailing list
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/