On 15 October 2016 at 16:27, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote: >> But I can bravely claim that it is better than *any* >> hex notation, it just follows from what I have here >> on paper on my table, namely that it is physically >> impossible to make up highly effective glyph system >> of more than 8 symbols. > > You should go and hang out with jmf. Both of you have made bold > assertions that our current system is physically/mathematically
Who is jmf? > impossible, despite the fact that *it is working*. Neither of you can > cite any actual scientific research to back your claims. No, please don't ask that. I have enough work in real life. And you tend to understand too literally my words here. Mikhail _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
