On 15 October 2016 at 16:27, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But I can bravely claim that it is better than *any*
>> hex notation, it just follows from what I have here
>> on paper on my table, namely that it is physically
>> impossible to make up highly effective glyph system
>> of more than 8 symbols.
> You should go and hang out with jmf. Both of you have made bold
> assertions that our current system is physically/mathematically

Who is jmf?

> impossible, despite the fact that *it is working*. Neither of you can
> cite any actual scientific research to back your claims.
No, please don't ask that. I have enough work in real life. And you tend to
understand too literally my words here.

Python-ideas mailing list
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to