On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > While it *is* a little unusual to implement it that way, I don't think > that's sufficient reason to break with the established output format > for the plain "-V".
Seems reasonable. Minor point: I'd be forever having to check whether it's -vV, -Vv, or -VV - particularly as I often find myself using "python -v", and groaning at the spew of spam as interactive Python starts up in verbose mode. Can all three be added, maybe? Then -Vv and -vV are "verbose version", and -VV is "version, and more so" (in the same way that -qq is more quiet than q, or -gg is more debuggy than -g). ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
