On 28/05/2014 20:58, Larry Martell wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid
<mailto:no.email@nospam.invalid>> wrote:

    Larry Martell <larry.mart...@gmail.com
    <mailto:larry.mart...@gmail.com>> writes:
     > Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
     > [1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/

    "Python 3 can revive Python" https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10
       long HN comment thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801834

    "Python 3 is fine" http://sealedabstract.com/rants/python-3-is-fine/

    OT: wow that medium site is obnoxious.

No company that I work for is using python 3 - they just have too much
of an investment in a python 2 code base to switch. I'm just saying.

So you're happy because you've support until at least 2020, and the people using Python 3 are happy, mainly because of the vastly improved unicode handling via the FSR and asyncio in 3.4. Presumably the only unhappy people are those who keep bleating on about forking Python to produce a 2.8, or has work on this already started without my knowledge?

My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.


Reply via email to