| darthbhyrava added a comment. |
In T138304#2410111, @01tonythomas wrote:Its stated clearly that the MVP should be in merged state before the mid-term deadline, and being there at the both end of GSoC, I need to agree with @jayvdb that it is the duty of the student to find alternatives and get their code mergeable somehow.
@01tonythomas, it seems that you have made your decisions without looking at my MVP. My MVP does not require code to be merged, it needs a +2 from jenkins, which I have achieved. I post my MVP here:
- MVP for the mid-term evaluation:
- The MVP would be subtasks 1 and 2 implemented, reviewed and wrapped up.
- The code for subtasks 1 and 2 must all be merged to pass the mid-term evaluation.
- If the code is not completely merged, then the code may still be considered if all of it has been submitted in Gerrit with a +2 from jenkins-bot.
- There must be a branch on my GitHub fork which has all the aforementioned patches integrated and all the tests passing.
- Apart from the technical deliverables, I would also be having weekly reports for progress along with a weekly blog post, and regularly update the documentation as required.
Please read point 3. It can be considered, and I find the consideration very unfair and illogical, as it not being backed up, and my valid counter-arguments are being dismissed without being responded to.
In T138304#2410111, @01tonythomas wrote:@darthbhyrava The decision of the mentors is final, and I'm not sure if there would be any effect in trying to change that now.
No, it is NOT final. Please read this. I quote:
In the unlikely event that a mentor and organization administrator do not agree on a student’s grade for any evaluation, the decision of the organization administrator is the final one.
In the also unlikely event that a student does not agree with a mentoring organization’s evaluation decision at either the midterm or the final, the student may choose to submit his/her entire project plan, timeline and code sample to Google’s program administrators. Google will choose a Google engineer who is not working with any Google Summer of Code mentoring organization or the Melange project to review the code and arbitrate the decision. The decision of Google’s independent engineer is final.
I urge @01tonythomas and @Sumit to look at this new piece of information and reconsider their decisions. YOUR decision is final, if you believe that I should be passed.
In case you choose not to, and do not have justifiable decisions to back them up, I would be left with no choice but to approach the independent Google engineer, and other such options.
Cc: Niharika, QuimGil, jayvdb, EBernhardson, Legoktm, darthbhyrava, Xqt, Mpaa, valhallasw, kaldari, polybuildr, pywikibot-bugs-list, Aklapper, Billghost, zhuyifei1999, Sumit, Zppix, 01tonythomas, Lethexie, Mdupont, fbstj, Catrope, Jay8g
_______________________________________________ pywikibot-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot-bugs
