On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > wrote: > >> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>>> <snip> >>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application >>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use >>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained >> units >>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Keith >>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. >> -- >>>>> sounds ideal. >>>>> >>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification? >>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder >>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them >>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either >>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are >>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on >>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers. >>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done >>> this as well. :( >>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current >>> personal schedule. >>> >>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under -- >>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/ >>> >>> and just use your structure so we can take a look? >> Kay; >> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was >> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of >> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different >> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all. >> > > The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed mostly to > be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the time > which is why > > I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on > TestLInk. > > > >> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy >> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week. >> > Sounds good! Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to the ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend and some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic. Regards Keith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
