On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application >>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use >>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained >>>> units >>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> Keith >>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. >>>> -- >>>>>>> sounds ideal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification? >>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder >>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them >>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either >>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are >>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on >>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers. >>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done >>>>> this as well. :( >>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current >>>>> personal schedule. >>>>> >>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under -- >>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/ >>>>> >>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look? >>>> Kay; >>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was >>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of >>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different >>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all. >>>> >>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed mostly to >>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the time >>> which is why >>> >>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on >>> TestLInk. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy >>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week. >>>> >>> Sounds good! >> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to the >> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the >> production website. Is there something else I should have changed? >> >> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend and >> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic. >> >> Regards >> Keith > Hi Keith -- > No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after > committing? No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be glad to do that in the future.
BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add it to my keyring. Regards Keith > If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation > script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime. > Thanks so much for your work on this, > >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
