I have now submitted the deletion of the index.html. I don't know why it didn't work for you...
Regards, Matthias Am 11.06.2018 um 23:09 schrieb Kay Schenk: > > On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> Keith, short update -- see below >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things >>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file >>> needs to be regenerated. >> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my >> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem. >> >> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them. >> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos >> having difficulty with Windows line endings >> >> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the >> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL >> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can >> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if >> y'all think that might help. >> >> Regards >> Keith > From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn > update, everything cam through OK. > > On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify > on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the > "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before > I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is > STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden" > message for the whole directory. > > I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures > in the index generation script, in: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh > > in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for > dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be > regenerated whenever changes are made to this area. > > >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never >>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add >>>>> it to my keyring. >>>>> >>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when >>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Keith >>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation >>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime. >>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this, >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> MzK >>>> >>>> "Less is MORE." >>>> >>> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
