Response inline On 6/17/2018 5:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > Hi again...see below > > On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> Keith, short update -- see below >>>>> >>>>> <snip> >>>>> >>>>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things >>>>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file >>>>> needs to be regenerated. >>>> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my >>>> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem. >>>> >>>> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them. >>>> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos >>>> having difficulty with Windows line endings >>>> >>>> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the >>>> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL >>>> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can >>>> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if >>>> y'all think that might help. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Keith >>> From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn >>> update, everything cam through OK. >> The only potential downfall is that even after an SVN update they are >> still showing as unversioned in my working copy. As the initial commit >> was only to evaluate a more detailed structure it isn't a problem for now. >> >> Keith > hmmm...well the Impress directory itself is NOT showing up on the > staging server, so this IS a problem. You just need to add the > directories themselves to svn and commit. > > I'm finding that adding the directories to the index script is not as > simple as I thought it would be, but I am working on it. (grrr! why does > stuff work on the command line but not inside a script!) My time is > quite limited for the rest of the week, so maybe in a week or so. > > Take care. > Kay; Just got home from a motorcycle ride to my better half's. Will do the add and re-commit after I do dishes.
Take Care Keith >>> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify >>> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the >>> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before >>> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is >>> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden" >>> message for the whole directory. >>> >>> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures >>> in the index generation script, in: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh >>> >>> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for >>> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be >>> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area. >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never >>>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add >>>>>>> it to my keyring. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird >>>>>> when >>>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Keith >>>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation >>>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime. >>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this, >>>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> MzK >>>>>> >>>>>> "Less is MORE." >>>>>> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
