On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> Keith, short update -- see below >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things >>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file >>> needs to be regenerated. >> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my >> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem. >> >> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them. >> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos >> having difficulty with Windows line endings >> >> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the >> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL >> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can >> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if >> y'all think that might help. >> >> Regards >> Keith > From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn > update, everything cam through OK. The only potential downfall is that even after an SVN update they are still showing as unversioned in my working copy. As the initial commit was only to evaluate a more detailed structure it isn't a problem for now.
Keith > > On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify > on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the > "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before > I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is > STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden" > message for the whole directory. > > I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures > in the index generation script, in: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh > > in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for > dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be > regenerated whenever changes are made to this area. > > >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never >>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add >>>>> it to my keyring. >>>>> >>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when >>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Keith >>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation >>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime. >>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this, >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> MzK >>>> >>>> "Less is MORE." >>>> >>> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
