Hi again...see below On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> Keith, short update -- see below >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things >>>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file >>>> needs to be regenerated. >>> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my >>> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem. >>> >>> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them. >>> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos >>> having difficulty with Windows line endings >>> >>> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the >>> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL >>> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can >>> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if >>> y'all think that might help. >>> >>> Regards >>> Keith >> From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn >> update, everything cam through OK.
> The only potential downfall is that even after an SVN update they are > still showing as unversioned in my working copy. As the initial commit > was only to evaluate a more detailed structure it isn't a problem for now. > > Keith hmmm...well the Impress directory itself is NOT showing up on the staging server, so this IS a problem. You just need to add the directories themselves to svn and commit. I'm finding that adding the directories to the index script is not as simple as I thought it would be, but I am working on it. (grrr! why does stuff work on the command line but not inside a script!) My time is quite limited for the rest of the week, so maybe in a week or so. Take care. >> >> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify >> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the >> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before >> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is >> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden" >> message for the whole directory. >> >> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures >> in the index generation script, in: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh >> >> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for >> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be >> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area. >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never >>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add >>>>>> it to my keyring. >>>>>> >>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when >>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Keith >>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation >>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime. >>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this, >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> MzK >>>>> >>>>> "Less is MORE." >>>>> >>>> >>> > > -- ------------------------------------------ MzK "Less is MORE."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
