Hi On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:21 PM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If it is expected that dpy_gfx_update is required, it should call > dpy_gfx_update. I agree it is not a right timing to fix vnc to remove > the implicit update as it is pre-existing. > However the lack of dpy_gfx_update call is a regression and should be > fixed. > > Calling dpy_gfx_update is done when the scanount.kind is SURFACE. dpy_gfx_update is specific to SURFACE, GL uses dpy_gl_update. -- Marc-André Lureau
