Hi Martin, On Wed, 19. Feb 2014 at 18:32:39 +0700, Martin Dobias wrote: > Agreed. If we decided to do time-based releases, let's do them as > planned and not discuss the decision two days before the planned > release...
Thanks, although I've already discarded my unfinished post after Marco's mail ;) > I think we should mainly reconsider which bugs should be marked as > blockers. The current policy "every regression is a blocker" does not > make sense to me. In my opinion a blocker is something that makes the > software unusable for potentially large amount of users - in such case > it makes sense to delay the release for few days (as an exception, not > a rule). Right, and that's was going to be my answer to Nathan's mail - discarded too :) A blocker just needs to be severe - and that's about it. It doesn't matter to me if it's a bug in a new feature or a regression. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode -- norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
