On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Martin Dobias <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, renderer tests should IMHO have some tolerances instead a set of > anomalies. For example, in multi-threading branch some tests started > to fail because of some microscopic differences - this will require > another set of reference images (and anomaly images) although there is > no real difference. This looks like an interesting tool for comparing > images: > http://pdiff.sourceforge.net/
I have updated at least single symbol in rendererstest. I was not able to get exactly the same image with the new renderer so I had to update control image and remove all anomalies. I have added tolerance for color components currently set to 15, i.e. about 6%, too much? Radim _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
