On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Vincent Picavet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Le mercredi 19 février 2014 12:32:39, Martin Dobias a écrit : > [...] >> Agreed. If we decided to do time-based releases, let's do them as >> planned and not discuss the decision two days before the planned >> release... >> >> I think we should mainly reconsider which bugs should be marked as >> blockers. The current policy "every regression is a blocker" does not >> make sense to me. In my opinion a blocker is something that makes the >> software unusable for potentially large amount of users - in such case >> it makes sense to delay the release for few days (as an exception, not >> a rule). > > +1 to all this > > It will probably take some time for all of us devs to take good habits of > fixing blockers as soon as possible. It will probably also encourage funders > to > give money to developers to fix them before the release.
But funders already gave money! I believe that they are interested in stable QGIS in the first place. Radim > At the end, it should be a better solution to keep strict fixed releases, and > should enforce code quality. > One way to ensure this is to work seriously on tests as well. > > > Vincent > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
