Ok having a think about this, you have convinced me this is the way to go. Carry on :)
Nathan On 19/02/2014 10:56 pm, "Jürgen E." <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Wed, 19. Feb 2014 at 18:32:39 +0700, Martin Dobias wrote: > > Agreed. If we decided to do time-based releases, let's do them as > > planned and not discuss the decision two days before the planned > > release... > > Thanks, although I've already discarded my unfinished post after Marco's > mail > ;) > > > I think we should mainly reconsider which bugs should be marked as > > blockers. The current policy "every regression is a blocker" does not > > make sense to me. In my opinion a blocker is something that makes the > > software unusable for potentially large amount of users - in such case > > it makes sense to delay the release for few days (as an exception, not > > a rule). > > Right, and that's was going to be my answer to Nathan's mail - discarded > too :) > > A blocker just needs to be severe - and that's about it. It doesn't > matter to > me if it's a bug in a new feature or a regression. > > > Jürgen > > -- > Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 > Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 > Software Engineer D-26506 Norden > http://www.norbit.de > QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode > > -- > norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH > Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden > GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
