Il 02/06/2016 15:09, Bas Couwenberg ha scritto: > I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort.
From my side, I mentioned this as the second best option: > * the best option would be for saga developers to adopt a more standard > approach, e.g. avoid mixing up bugfixes (in point releases) and > changes in the parameters (only in major releases), and keep backward > compatibility for previous parameters in all life cycle of minor releases > * if this is not feasible, the approach by Johan (maintaining a saga > LTR) seems the best one, as it is a general solution, provided it is > also followed by an appropriate versioning and dependency management for > packages All the best, and thanks to all for the interesting discussion. Hopefully this will solve the iddue in a clean and stable way. IMHO this would considerably improve the overall situation. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
