On 06/03/2016 09:29 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/03/2016 09:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: >> Il 02/06/2016 15:09, Bas Couwenberg ha scritto: >>> I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort. >> >> From my side, I mentioned this as the second best option: > > Agreed. Unfortunately most of the this thread has been about forking > SAGA, which I consider highly unproductive when the SAGA developers are > now trying to solve the integration issues with an LTR.
I agree, forking is not the way to go. Fortunately the general opinion seems to be to either have a stable API upstream (e.g. LTR) or a merge of the two projects. Matthias _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
