On 06/03/2016 09:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 02/06/2016 15:09, Bas Couwenberg ha scritto: >> I notice a distinct lack of consideration for the SAGA LTR effort. > > From my side, I mentioned this as the second best option:
Agreed. Unfortunately most of the this thread has been about forking SAGA, which I consider highly unproductive when the SAGA developers are now trying to solve the integration issues with an LTR. That effort should be applauded and supported. Forking should be the option of last resort when the SAGA community proves unable to resolve the issue. I personally look forward to having the SAGA LTR in Debian to help resolve #807339 qgis: saga not available in processing toolbox. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
