Hi Régis, 

Good points. OGC certification is certainly important and would help us
market QGIS server to potential users. On the other hand - for me
personally - improving performance to bring it at least back to the same
level like version 2 (if not better) is of much higher priority. 

Thanks for having a look at how certification may work. 

Let's talk about it in Madeira. 

Andreas 

On 2018-02-08 11:25, Régis Haubourg wrote:

> Hi all, 
> 
> As you know, QGIS server has been fully refactored for QGIS 3. 
> 
> Now some big enterprises are starting to rely on it in production environment 
> and would like to consolidate again QGIS server. 
> 
> I have some informations and questions :
> 
> # OGC certification
> 
> I got in touch with the OGC certification team, in the aim of getting 
> official certification, since we pass all WMS 1.3.0 tests. 
> If we seek a reference implementation status on behalf of OSGEO and QGIS.org, 
> there should be no fees, that's great news. The process must be renewed every 
> year. 
> We started the online testing process here: 
> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine. It's failing currently, probably 
> because of IP redirections we need to fix in our reference server (the one 
> used by the continuous integration system) 
> 
> We are asked to start evaluating WFS conformity too, but that should be a bit 
> painful since there is no API in TeamEngine to make continuous integration, 
> and online platform is not responding. So I'm not confident we'll have quick 
> results here. 
> 
> If everything goes well, I think QGIS can be certified soon! I think this 
> will be very interesting to advertise in the doc and website. 
> 
> The OGC team seems really happy to see QGIS getting in the certification 
> loop, and suggest we also try to certify QGIS as a client. If anyone has 
> worked in that area, that would be nice to join efforts. 
> 
> # Performance 
> 
> * We are still interested in having performance measure reference and ideally 
> have performance driven development with a continuous integration system. 
> Yves, is there anything new on your side? 
> 
> * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in 2.x, they 
> were not forwarded to the database when possible, and implied reading the 
> whole layer in memory before doing the spatial query on the QGIS side. Anyone 
> knows if it's still the case?  
> 
> all the best 
> Régis 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to