Good points. OGC certification is certainly important and would help us
market QGIS server to potential users. On the other hand - for me
personally - improving performance to bring it at least back to the same
level like version 2 (if not better) is of much higher priority.
Thanks for having a look at how certification may work.
Let's talk about it in Madeira.
On 2018-02-08 11:25, Régis Haubourg wrote:
> Hi all,
> As you know, QGIS server has been fully refactored for QGIS 3.
> Now some big enterprises are starting to rely on it in production environment
> and would like to consolidate again QGIS server.
> I have some informations and questions :
> # OGC certification
> I got in touch with the OGC certification team, in the aim of getting
> official certification, since we pass all WMS 1.3.0 tests.
> If we seek a reference implementation status on behalf of OSGEO and QGIS.org,
> there should be no fees, that's great news. The process must be renewed every
> We started the online testing process here:
> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine. It's failing currently, probably
> because of IP redirections we need to fix in our reference server (the one
> used by the continuous integration system)
> We are asked to start evaluating WFS conformity too, but that should be a bit
> painful since there is no API in TeamEngine to make continuous integration,
> and online platform is not responding. So I'm not confident we'll have quick
> results here.
> If everything goes well, I think QGIS can be certified soon! I think this
> will be very interesting to advertise in the doc and website.
> The OGC team seems really happy to see QGIS getting in the certification
> loop, and suggest we also try to certify QGIS as a client. If anyone has
> worked in that area, that would be nice to join efforts.
> # Performance
> * We are still interested in having performance measure reference and ideally
> have performance driven development with a continuous integration system.
> Yves, is there anything new on your side?
> * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in 2.x, they
> were not forwarded to the database when possible, and implied reading the
> whole layer in memory before doing the spatial query on the QGIS side. Anyone
> knows if it's still the case?
> all the best
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
QGIS-Developer mailing list
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer