> > > > * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in 2.x, they > were not forwarded to the database when possible, and implied reading the > whole layer in memory before doing the spatial query on the QGIS side. > Anyone knows if it's still the case? > > > No changes here. You just have to specify a QGIS2.ini or QGIS3.ini to > speficy this. > René-Luc, >
I probably missed something. Are you refering to the taking advantage of the setting "Evaluate expressions on QGIS side when possible" ? > Good points. OGC certification is certainly important and would help us > market QGIS server to potential users. On the other hand - for me > personally - improving performance to bring it at least back to the same > level like version 2 (if not better) is of much higher priority. > > Thanks for having a look at how certification may work. > > Let's talk about it in Madeira. > Yep, I agree on the priorities too, we are in an estimating stage for Orange. I bet the thread anbout performance can push this one upper on the todo list :) Let's sprint that in Madeira. Cheers Régis 2018-02-08 16:07 GMT+01:00 Andreas Neumann <a.neum...@carto.net>: > Hi Régis, > > Good points. OGC certification is certainly important and would help us > market QGIS server to potential users. On the other hand - for me > personally - improving performance to bring it at least back to the same > level like version 2 (if not better) is of much higher priority. > > Thanks for having a look at how certification may work. > > Let's talk about it in Madeira. > > Andreas > > On 2018-02-08 11:25, Régis Haubourg wrote: > > Hi all, > > As you know, QGIS server has been fully refactored for QGIS 3. > > Now some big enterprises are starting to rely on it in production > environment and would like to consolidate again QGIS server. > > I have some informations and questions : > > > # OGC certification > > I got in touch with the OGC certification team, in the aim of getting > official certification, since we pass all WMS 1.3.0 tests. > If we seek a reference implementation status on behalf of OSGEO and > QGIS.org, there should be no fees, that's great news. > The process must be renewed every year. > We started the online testing process here: http://cite.opengeospatial. > org/teamengine. It's failing currently, probably because of IP > redirections we need to fix in our reference server (the one used by the > continuous integration system) > > We are asked to start evaluating WFS conformity too, but that should be a > bit painful since there is no API in TeamEngine to make continuous > integration, and online platform is not responding. So I'm not confident > we'll have quick results here. > > If everything goes well, I think QGIS can be certified soon! I think this > will be very interesting to advertise in the doc and website. > > The OGC team seems really happy to see QGIS getting in the certification > loop, and suggest we also try to certify QGIS as a client. If anyone has > worked in that area, that would be nice to join efforts. > > > # Performance > > * We are still interested in having performance measure reference and > ideally have performance driven development with a continuous integration > system. Yves, is there anything new on your side? > > * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in 2.x, they > were not forwarded to the database when possible, and implied reading the > whole layer in memory before doing the spatial query on the QGIS side. > Anyone knows if it's still the case? > > > > all the best > Régis > > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer