Great news, merci Régis. IMHO it is not important to set priorities: both standards and performances are important, for different reasons, and implementing one will not interfere with the other - just different actors will be involved. I'm sure both will receive higher support from PSC and QGIS community as a whole, especially power users. All the best.
Il 08/02/2018 17:20, Régis Haubourg ha scritto: > >> >> * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in >> 2.x, they were not forwarded to the database when possible, and >> implied reading the whole layer in memory before doing the spatial >> query on the QGIS side. Anyone knows if it's still the case? >> > > No changes here. You just have to specify a QGIS2.ini or QGIS3.ini > to speficy this. > René-Luc, > > > I probably missed something. Are you refering to the taking advantage of > the setting "Evaluate expressions on QGIS side when possible" ? > > > Good points. OGC certification is certainly important and would help > us market QGIS server to potential users. On the other hand - for me > personally - improving performance to bring it at least back to the > same level like version 2 (if not better) is of much higher priority. > > Thanks for having a look at how certification may work. > > Let's talk about it in Madeira. > > Yep, I agree on the priorities too, we are in an estimating stage for > Orange. I bet the thread anbout performance can push this one upper on > the todo list :) > Let's sprint that in Madeira. > > Cheers > Régis > > > 2018-02-08 16:07 GMT+01:00 Andreas Neumann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > Hi Régis, > > Good points. OGC certification is certainly important and would help > us market QGIS server to potential users. On the other hand - for me > personally - improving performance to bring it at least back to the > same level like version 2 (if not better) is of much higher priority. > > Thanks for having a look at how certification may work. > > Let's talk about it in Madeira. > > Andreas > > On 2018-02-08 11:25, Régis Haubourg wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As you know, QGIS server has been fully refactored for QGIS 3. >> >> Now some big enterprises are starting to rely on it in production >> environment and would like to consolidate again QGIS server. >> >> I have some informations and questions : >> >> >> # OGC certification >> >> I got in touch with the OGC certification team, in the aim of >> getting official certification, since we pass all WMS 1.3.0 tests. >> If we seek a reference implementation status on behalf of OSGEO >> and QGIS.org, there should be no fees, that's great news. >> The process must be renewed every year. >> We started the online testing process here: >> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine >> <http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine>. It's failing >> currently, probably because of IP redirections we need to fix in >> our reference server (the one used by the continuous integration >> system) >> >> We are asked to start evaluating WFS conformity too, but that >> should be a bit painful since there is no API in TeamEngine to >> make continuous integration, and online platform is not >> responding. So I'm not confident we'll have quick results here. >> >> If everything goes well, I think QGIS can be certified soon! I >> think this will be very interesting to advertise in the doc and >> website. >> >> The OGC team seems really happy to see QGIS getting in the >> certification loop, and suggest we also try to certify QGIS as a >> client. If anyone has worked in that area, that would be nice to >> join efforts. >> >> >> # Performance >> >> * We are still interested in having performance measure reference >> and ideally have performance driven development with a continuous >> integration system. Yves, is there anything new on your side? >> >> * One blocker for WFS was the performance of spatial filter, in >> 2.x, they were not forwarded to the database when possible, and >> implied reading the whole layer in memory before doing the spatial >> query on the QGIS side. Anyone knows if it's still the case? >> >> >> >> all the best >> Régis >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
