Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Yes, for non-legacy stuff, some people will probably still want to use > RDBMSes, and instead of arguing our head off, we could have > EntityStore for it.
From a strategic point of view this is definitely correct. "Can I use it with Hibernate?" is still one of the most common questions I get about Qi4j. Even if all the idiocies of RDBMS-style persistence has been pointed out they still want to (or is forced to) to continue to shoot themselves in the proverbial foot. It is what it is. So for now having this RDBMS EntityStore is going to be strategically important. Once they are in there, and can comfortably work with it, there's a way out by converting to new-style databases (memcachedb looks like a very interesting option for example). /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
