On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> Yes, for non-legacy stuff, some people will probably still want to use >> RDBMSes, and instead of arguing our head off, we could have >> EntityStore for it. > > From a strategic point of view this is definitely correct. "Can I use > it with Hibernate?" is still one of the most common questions I get > about Qi4j. Even if all the idiocies of RDBMS-style persistence has been > pointed out they still want to (or is forced to) to continue to shoot > themselves in the proverbial foot. It is what it is.
Yes, but HibernateEntityStore is more stupid than one is allowed to be... Regarding memcachedb; IIUIC, this is a 'native server' with a Java client API. Sounds like automated test nightmare (like the one I have with Jini at the moment). Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
