Niclas Hedhman wrote: >>> Yes, for non-legacy stuff, some people will probably still want to use >>> RDBMSes, and instead of arguing our head off, we could have >>> EntityStore for it. >> From a strategic point of view this is definitely correct. "Can I use >> it with Hibernate?" is still one of the most common questions I get >> about Qi4j. Even if all the idiocies of RDBMS-style persistence has been >> pointed out they still want to (or is forced to) to continue to shoot >> themselves in the proverbial foot. It is what it is. > > Yes, but HibernateEntityStore is more stupid than one is allowed to be...
Agree. > Regarding memcachedb; IIUIC, this is a 'native server' with a Java > client API. Sounds like automated test nightmare (like the one I have > with Jini at the moment). Yes, it's native, with BDB as backend. For production I think it can be ideal though, with the support for clustering, replication, failover, hot backups, etc. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
