Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Regarding memcachedb; IIUIC, this is a 'native server' with a Java >>> client API. Sounds like automated test nightmare (like the one I have >>> with Jini at the moment). >> Yes, it's native, with BDB as backend. For production I think it can be >> ideal though, with the support for clustering, replication, failover, >> hot backups, etc. > > It says it is memcache API compatible. So, that would mean we can test > our stuff against something else??
Might be possible, true. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
