Niclas Hedhman wrote:
-org.qi4j.runtime.value.ValuePropertyModel field propertyInfo hides a field
with the same name declared in the class PersistentPropertyModel.
propertyInfo is indeed unnecessary. There is also a PropertyType field
with the same issue in the same classes. But the initialization is
different, so I would like to have Rickard's opinion on this. Either
the superclass's field is pushed down to its subclasses, or it being
passed in constructor.
Yeah, the reason is the different initialization. Removing the duplicate
and fixing it through constructor argument passing would be ok though.
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
