Wolfgang Lenerz writes: > > Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: > > >> Default could also be DATAD$ or whatever. > > > that would defeat the wholme exercice. > > > > Why that? It's just a fallback solution if otherwise no other > > directory can be provided (none set). > > Well, it already exists... > Wouldn't it be better if the user explicitly set default home dirs per job > name?
Doesnt this defeat the object? We already can do this with a simple Config block. The point of a Homedir is that you can always know the name and path of the current job from wherever it is executed. (BTW, by supplying the name too, it would allow the program to poke its own binary on disk, eg for configuration purposes). <> Per _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
