On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:46:17 -0000, George Gwilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2007, at 18:38, Rich Mellor wrote: > >> >>>> I agree with your comment George, however, I wonder how many people >>>> might >>>> be interested in working on smsq/e if they could easily compile >>>> it on a >>>> non-68020+ environment. Q-emuLator can run SMSQ/e Gold Card (it >>>> does >>>> not >>>> support 68020+) at least and it could possibly generate sufficient >>>> interest to persuade people to look at changing some of the other QL >>>> emulators to support SMSQ/e. >>> >>> I also favor a build system that can run on all 68000 systems, >>> including >>> all >>> emulators. >>> Couldn't GWASL be used insteas of GWASS? I doubt SMSQ/E has any >>> 68020+ >>> instructions, except for a few to set the cache registers, but >>> they are >>> coded as DC.W. >>> >> >> It is not the 68020+ instructions in smsq/e sources that are the >> problem. >> >> Rather it is the fact that GWASL does not support macros. > > Does the licence prevent A from sending his changes in SMSQE to B who > then compiles it and sends the results to B? > > George Not if he is sending it to himself !! That is the main problem in that unless the person is a reseller (although you do not have to pay or fee or anything, just ask), you cannot distribute the binary of smsq/e. You can however distribute a patch program to patch in your changes. -- Rich Mellor RWAP Services URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk URL:http://www.rwapservices.co.uk _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
