On 24 Feb 2007, at 18:38, Rich Mellor wrote: > >>> I agree with your comment George, however, I wonder how many people >>> might >>> be interested in working on smsq/e if they could easily compile >>> it on a >>> non-68020+ environment. Q-emuLator can run SMSQ/e Gold Card (it >>> does >>> not >>> support 68020+) at least and it could possibly generate sufficient >>> interest to persuade people to look at changing some of the other QL >>> emulators to support SMSQ/e. >> >> I also favor a build system that can run on all 68000 systems, >> including >> all >> emulators. >> Couldn't GWASL be used insteas of GWASS? I doubt SMSQ/E has any >> 68020+ >> instructions, except for a few to set the cache registers, but >> they are >> coded as DC.W. >> > > It is not the 68020+ instructions in smsq/e sources that are the > problem. > > Rather it is the fact that GWASL does not support macros.
Does the licence prevent A from sending his changes in SMSQE to B who then compiles it and sends the results to B? George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
