In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George Gwilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>I'm afraid the problem is far more complicated than just the naming >of parameters. The only way GWASS or Qmac could deal with both forms >of macro would be by writing a separate parser for each. There would >of course have to be a switch somewhere to tell the assembler which >macro type to expect. From this and your earlier comments, am I correct in understanding that GWASS is a more modern Assembler than Qmac ? Making GWASS the better way forward in the future. -- Malcolm Cadman _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
