In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George Gwilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 26 Feb 2007, at 16:12, Malcolm Cadman wrote: > >> >> Assembling the SMSQ/E source on GWASS as well as Qmac does give some >> future protection. >> >> The user would not experience any difference, I assume. Unless >> using a >> processor above a 60020 ? > >GWASS has a switch LOW_EA to prevent it producing 68020+ effective >addresses and long branches so that it produces the correct code for >SMSQE just as Qmac does. However, the possibility exists of having >the better 68020+ code for Q40/60 say. An example is the conversion >to floating point. This would be much more easily done using GWASS >than using Qmac where you would have to use DC.W instructions to >produce the code. > >George Thanks, that is clear. -- Malcolm Cadman _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
