On 23 Feb 2007, at 10:53, George Gwilt wrote: > >> >> The only other way would be to find someone to volunteer to convert >> the >> smsq/e sources (which were originally written using QMAC) so that >> they >> could be compiled with another assembler. However, GWASL is the only >> public domain assembler so this would require a lot of work and >> may be >> pointless after all - the resultant file sizes may be of such a >> size that >> it wouldn't be possible to compile it in the memory provided by a >> Gold >> Card anyway !! > > I can see that it would be nice if GWASL could be upgraded to deal > with macros in the way that GWASS does. One of the changes to GWASS > to allow assembly of SMSQE source was to translate macro calls > written for Qmac to the style needed by GWASS. To transfer all this > to GWASL would be a largish task. However, the source code for both > assemblers is available so it is open to anyone to have a go.
I wonder how many QL machines can run SMSQE but do not have a 68020+? I can only think of gold card. All the other types have one of 68020, 68040 and 68060. So how many people just have Gold cards and want to compile SMSQE? Two, or 200 or 5,000? George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
