In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George Gwilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >On 25 Feb 2007, at 17:30, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>> From this and your earlier comments, am I correct in understanding >> that >> GWASS is a more modern Assembler than Qmac ? George Gwilt replied : >GWASS has been changed fairly recently and will be changed again if >need be. > >Also GWASS assembles all the instructions in the 68000 series up to >the 68060 and this includes the Floating Point instructions. > >Its macro facility is similar to that of Qmac (apart from the >syntax). GWASS can do some things that Qmac can't and vice versa. OK. So , GWASS have some current support, which Qmac has not, I gather. Assembling the SMSQ/E source on GWASS as well as Qmac does give some future protection. The user would not experience any difference, I assume. Unless using a processor above a 60020 ? -- Malcolm Cadman _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
