My programs runs perfect at QDOS on standard QL but at QPCII the messeage "DEfines may not be with other clauses" Is is a bug of QPC or my code is badly written? (Also I can compile vis Turbo) Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcel Kilgus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 2:29 AM Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Ql-Users] Falling Cursor
> George Gwilt wrote: >> I notice that many people have a problem with fast cursor flashing. > > Well, I only noticed 3, none of those running QPC under Windows. And I > currently do not have any further ideas in this area because the > things told do not add up: > > - Fast key repeat and fast cursor flashing is a sure sign of increased > poll frequency. > - The poll test program though apparently testifies to a steady 50hz > poll. > - If the frequency actually is increased and the test still shows > 50hz, the time base of the test must be off in the same way. This > would be the SMSQ/E clock. > - But apparently the SMSQ/E clock is also not faster than real time. > > To the last point, regarding this comment from Norman: > | I left it running for 15 minutes and it kept exactly the same time. > > What I should probably have said is that QPC does re-synchronize the > SMSQ/E clock with the system clock once per minute. So even if the > clock is runaway fast it will be right again one minute later. > >> My problem is that sometimes the cursor will not remain where it is >> placed, by the mouse or cursor keys. Instead it drops directly to the >> bottom of the screen at a constant, fairly fast, speed. Perhaps 1 1/2 >> seconds for a full screen. > > Well, QPC does not use any relative mouse movements which could > explain the behaviour, instead it uses an absolute mouse positioning > scheme. Basically the Windows mouse coordinates are directly > translated to the SMSQ/E mouse position. > > Therefore my first guess would be that you're using an optical mouse > that has problems with the surface it's on. The second guess is that > something strange is going on on the SMSQ/E side of things. Did it > ever happen on a clean machine? > > Marcel > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm > _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
