Hi Michael, Can you let us have a sample of the code causing the problem.
Rich Dr M. Hanias wrote: > My programs runs perfect at QDOS on standard QL but at QPCII the messeage > "DEfines may not be with other clauses" > Is is a bug of QPC or my code is badly written? (Also I can compile vis > Turbo) > Michael > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marcel Kilgus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 2:29 AM > Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Ql-Users] Falling Cursor > > > >> George Gwilt wrote: >> >>> I notice that many people have a problem with fast cursor flashing. >>> >> Well, I only noticed 3, none of those running QPC under Windows. And I >> currently do not have any further ideas in this area because the >> things told do not add up: >> >> - Fast key repeat and fast cursor flashing is a sure sign of increased >> poll frequency. >> - The poll test program though apparently testifies to a steady 50hz >> poll. >> - If the frequency actually is increased and the test still shows >> 50hz, the time base of the test must be off in the same way. This >> would be the SMSQ/E clock. >> - But apparently the SMSQ/E clock is also not faster than real time. >> >> To the last point, regarding this comment from Norman: >> | I left it running for 15 minutes and it kept exactly the same time. >> >> What I should probably have said is that QPC does re-synchronize the >> SMSQ/E clock with the system clock once per minute. So even if the >> clock is runaway fast it will be right again one minute later. >> >> >>> My problem is that sometimes the cursor will not remain where it is >>> placed, by the mouse or cursor keys. Instead it drops directly to the >>> bottom of the screen at a constant, fairly fast, speed. Perhaps 1 1/2 >>> seconds for a full screen. >>> >> Well, QPC does not use any relative mouse movements which could >> explain the behaviour, instead it uses an absolute mouse positioning >> scheme. Basically the Windows mouse coordinates are directly >> translated to the SMSQ/E mouse position. >> >> Therefore my first guess would be that you're using an optical mouse >> that has problems with the surface it's on. The second guess is that >> something strange is going on on the SMSQ/E side of things. Did it >> ever happen on a clean machine? >> >> Marcel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QL-Users Mailing List >> http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm > > > -- Rich Mellor RWAP Services URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk URL:http://www.rwapservices.co.uk _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
