Norman,

QT might produce a portable result, but it is much harder to program.

DAve

-----Original Message-----
From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com
[mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Norman Dunbar
Sent: 14 October 2009 21:56
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

Evening all,

> ...
> As I said if you were interested in producing a Windows graphic 
> front-end then feel free to go ahead.  It should not be very hard to 
> do using Microsoft .NET toolset.
Or, even beter QT!

Cheers,
Norman.
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to