The Qt source download is about 375Mb (in compressed format), so that would be an immense amount of code to port. Qt assumes a graphical UI, so there would be a need to write a QL specific mapping to support this. It is also written largely in C++, so there would probably have to be port of something like gcc as well - another none trivial task. I cannot see anyone taking on a task of that sort of magnitude on a QL environment.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Norman Dunbar Sent: 16 October 2009 17:01 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources Hi Derek, > Is QT a good platform, I used to dabble a little in Linux. I like it, Dave Walker thinks it's a little harder to program that .net - I have no idea as I don't program .net. There are bots of QT that take a while to get your head around. It is, in many places, less easy to figure out that Borlan C++ Builder used to be. Dave has a point! > I assume there is a Windows version... How about a QL version There are many versions available at http://qt.nokia.com/. Cheers, Norman. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
