Hi Adrian,
I would be interested in seeing the finished XT68 with long file names.
I also did not realise, that XTC8 was in fact C68. Just goes to show you.
I aam wondering if XTC68 can run under Windows Mobile.
Derek
Adrian D. Ives wrote:
Hello Dave,
No, I didn't realize that XTC68 was the same thing as C68. That's why I
enquired about the source ;)
There is, of course, no need to produce a graphic front end as there
are several freeware C development IDEs out there that could be
pressed into service for this purpose. I was interested only in
removing any limitations under the Win32 platform. For example, in the
very limited documentation I have mention is made of an 8.3 filename
restriction.
Instead, I can now re-compile the current C68sources.
Thanks for your help,
Adrian
Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 1:42:48 PM, you wrote:
Adrian,
I was not upset or anything - I just wondered if you realized that. The
XTC68 was just the version compiled to run on DOS and produce 68000 code. In
fact most of the C68 development actually took place under Windows using
Visual C as the debugging tools were rather better.
There has been no change for a very long time now. I guess if some bug
reports were received it might be looked at again.
As I said if you were interested in producing a Windows graphic front-end
then feel free to go ahead. It should not be very hard to do using
Microsoft .NET toolset.
Dave
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
