On 12 Dec 2009, at 12:35, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > > QPC replaces the SMSQ/E trig (and other) functions with x86 floating > point code, so that's even faster ;) But apart from that QPC2 is > lacking native FPU support, yes.
The point about Q60 having an FPU is to allow programmers to use it for themselves. I agree that QPC2 is much faster all round than the Q60. Perhaps FPU for users should be added to QPC2?? George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
