gdgqler wrote: > The point about Q60 having an FPU is to allow programmers to use it > for themselves. I agree that QPC2 is much faster all round than the Q60. > > Perhaps FPU for users should be added to QPC2??
I've looked into it many times and found it too much work for the payoff (which I expect to be next to none). Granted, back then I was quite a bit younger and all this floating point stuff seemed much more intimidating. Nowadays I could probably pull it off with much more easy but don't have nearly the free time I had then... Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
