Peter wrote: > come on... my point was the lost speed race for hardware, where I actually > _agreed_ to you. Makes really no sense you pull a minor mention of history > out of context and construct another debate about SMSQ/E licensing. I just > don't care anymore.
You have mentioned this stuff numerous time, which is what triggered this response, not just this one mail. But I accept that you don't care anymore, okay. > Your insights about licensing come too late to help me. At this point, > returning to SMSQ/E would only add work for me. But you should certainly > make it open source for others. Then, as I said, simply release the stuff for QDOS and let other's worry about SMSQ/E. That should work fine, too, I guess. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
