Marcel Kilgus wrote: > You have mentioned this stuff numerous time, which is what triggered > this response, not just this one mail. But I accept that you don't > care anymore, okay.
Not about the SMSQ/E license. I still care about QL hardware of course, and keep the viewpoint about what happened - not that you get me wrong. > Then, as I said, simply release the stuff for QDOS and let other's > worry about SMSQ/E. That should work fine, too, I guess. As I said, I can not "simply" release unfinished software I didn't touch for years. Currently I'd have to offer a new release of QDOS Classic which would sort of make me OS maintainer - no thanks. Other QL work has priority now, and only if that can be finished, I might have time to dig native TCP/IP out again - I hope Minerva based then. Peter _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
