On 3/25/2011 3:09 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Send Ql-Users mailing list submissions to
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:52:22 +0000 From: Malcolm Cadman<[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quorums Message-ID:<[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
In message<[email protected]>, Rich Mellor <[email protected]> writes
-------------------------------------------------- From: "John Taylor"<[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:18 PM To:<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quorums
On 22 Mar 2011, at 16:57, Geoff Wicks wrote:
A Quanta member has sent the committee some suggestions for amending the constitution to provide for the situation where an AGM is inquorate.
I raised this question at the 2008 AGM and John Mason said that "proxy votes count towards a quorum". (The quotation comes from the minutes of the meeting.) I tend to disagree with John on this point, but I am unable to prove that he is wrong. Equally I am unable to prove that he is right.
What does Robert's Rules of Order have to say on this matter?? http://www.robertsrules.org/ -- Paul Holmgren Mine: 2 57 300-C's in Indy Hers: 05 PT GT R/T HO Stage 1 Hoosier Corps L#6 _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
